Mohammed Asaad • about 3 years ago
share your disappointment in the results
in my app category presentation controller +(added value features) the result was completely based on the video, from you tube analytic i can see only 3 judges saw the video before judging period and 2 of them didn't even completer to tone minute and none of them downloaded the desktop app, if you are making a challenge that you expect the developer to work on for 2 months at least have enough respect for the developer and see the full video even if it didn't have fancy effects;
one of the competitor slide easy have a really professional video but coming to the facts his app is not even practical it require the presentation to be PDF (who use PDF to make a presentation?) and the connection to be made form the phone thru MHL wire which require user to hold extra wires and adapter if the show room is using VGA projector; even going to the feature department you ca use hand gesture to control the app which is not professional since the user base is business men/ teachers what kind of professional person will slap the air to navigate around the pages.
another app Presenter, it's noting but a navigation controller no added features and require the phone to initiate the connection.
my app is on time setup and easy connection thru gear only and feature wise i think it's the best where it serve a real need for the user; i tough this challenge about how good your app is, and not the video, that why i spent mote time on the app; this is completely unacceptable if you are going to waste 40 days of my time at least give me a fair judging chance, you could have extended the judging period and compared the apps instead of blindly choosing the best looking videos.
congratulation and sorry for the other developers , i am not trying to ruin your future chances ,i am just greatly disappointed by their plane judging method and lack of respect for developers like me who spent great amount of time building the app and they didn't even bother to see the full video .
Comments are closed.